|
SHRFB Coarse Angling Permit
(The letter and information
below was sent to all 226 Dail Deputies and Seanad Senators on 5th
June 2003)
5th June 2003
For
the attention of:
All Members of the Houses of the Oireachtas
Dear Member,
We are currently in dispute with the Shannon Regional Fisheries
Board on two related issues i.e. the introduction of a €35 coarse
angling permit on many midland waters and the continued use of gillnets
to remove and kill thousands of pike and coarse fish from some of
these midland waters.
Coarse Angling Permit
This charge to fish the Rivers Suck and the River Inny together
with their respective lakes was introduced for the first time this
year. We object to this on a number of grounds, principally;
1. We are expected to fish waters where the Shannon Regional Fisheries
Board is intent on killing the very fish we are expected to pay
to fish for.
2. Our permit fees could well be used to help fund the pseudo killing
operations.
3. We are of the opinion that these waters should be operated as
mixed fisheries and that coarse fish should not be removed from
them. In this regard, please note that large numbers of the pike/coarse
fish being killed are of specimen and record weight. If marketed
properly, these waters could attract thousands of visiting coarse
anglers.
4. The numbers of overseas visiting coarse anglers have dropped
from 170,000 in 1996 to 89,000 in 2000. The introduction of additional
costs will only help to drive more away.
Gillnetting
Gillnetting is a horrible and cruel way of removing fish from a
lake. Long nets are set, which fish of all species swim into and
become entangled and damaged. Fish sometimes die within a few hours
though normally it would take a day or two. This is a barbaric method
and has no place in the twenty first century. Wildlife can also
become entangled and die as some of our photographs show.
Our 7000 members have voted to boycott these waters (see flier)
and we are requesting all anglers to do the same. If no progress
is made we will shortly be erecting "NO FISHING please" posters
on many of these waters where local clubs and landowners agree.
We will also be advising U.K and Continental tour operators of the
position. We do not wish to go down this path. You can update yourself
by visiting our website at www.angling-in-ireland.com. If you would
like clarification on any issue, please do not hesitate to contact
me. We would welcome your support on the above issues and we kindly
request that you contact the Minister for Communication, Marine
and Natural Resource and the Shannon Regional Fisheries Board with
your considered views.
Yours sincerely,
John Chambers
Hon. Chairman
****************************************
DID
YOU PAY FOR THIS ?
If you purchased a Euro35 Shannon Regional Fisheries Board permit
you may have helped fund this!
This year the Shannon Regional Fisheries Board have introduced a
coarse fishing permit on a wide range of waters in the midlands.
The Irish Federation of Pike Angling Clubs objected to this permit
on a number of grounds, which would include:
(a) We are expected to pay Euro35 to fish waters where our
fees may be used to fund gill netting and killing of the very fish
we want to catch
(b) Angling tourist visitor numbers have plummeted from 170,000
in 1996 to 89,000 in 2000. We believe that this extra cost on visiting
anglers may lead to a further decrease in visitors
(c) Some of the Shannon Board's "Managed Waters" where pike
and coarse fish are killed hold huge numbers of specimen and record
coarse fish. An example would be the specimen and record Roach to
5lbs 4oz netted and killed on Lough Ennell in 2002. There should
be a cessation of removal of these valuable fish and these waters
should be developed to their best potential in the local and national
interest.
To secure a fair deal for coarse and pike anglers we request your
support in bringing about a change in Shannon Regional Fishery Board
policy.
PLEASE BOYCOTT the "Managed Waters" which include the following:
River Suck and Loughs Hollygrove, Loung and Doo River Inny and Lough's
Sheelin, Kinale, Derravaragh, Owel, Ennell, Ballinafid, Mc Evoys,
Slevins, Sheever,Iron Rivers Brosna and Little Brosna
PLEASE WRITE TO the members of the Shannon Regional Fisheries
Board and Public Representatives to inform them of your views on
their coarse permit.
Members
of the Shannon Regional Fisheries Board (Addresses supplied)
Jim Horgan
Andy Mc Callion
Patrick Peril
Mathew Benn
Gabriel Mc Kenna
John Slattery
Michael Flanagan
Edmond Costello
Martin Mc Enroe
Michael Callaghan
Sean Young
Joe O' Donaghue
Jim Robinson
Paddy Isdell
Seamus Mc Dermot
Mary Bohan
Declan Quigley
Mary Candler-Kennedy
Peg Ward Heslin
Breege Murray
Paddy Mackey
Cllr. Hugh Lynn
Issued by the Irish Federation of Pike Angling Clubs, Oldcastle
Road, Ballyjamesduff, Co. Cavan
***************************************
Article
in the "Roscommon Champion" dated 16th May 2003
What
angler told Fisheries Board after group outing switched from Roscommon
to Arva
The
following is a copy of a letter - which is self-explanatory - sent
to the Shannon Regional Fisheries Board - and forwarded for publication,
to the Roscommon Champion:
Eamonn
Cusack,
Shannon Regional Fisheries Board,
Limerick.
Dear Sir,
Thank you Mr. Cusack, thank you very much for your vision and your
foresight. Thank you very much for the introduction of this tax,
licence, permit or whatever you wish to call it. Thank you very
much for one of the most enjoyable fishing weekends I and twenty
of my colleagues have ever enjoyed. Yes, due
to the 'permit' our annual pike fishing outing, between our club
and Dublin bus, was switched from Roscommon to Arva in Co. Cavan.
Our initial plan was to base our group in Roscommon town and fish
the surrounding Suck valley. This was sadly spoiled by the introduction
of this ' Permit'. Each member of our group agreed that, on principal
alone, we would not purchase a 'Permit' in any form, which regrettably
led to the cancellation of our hotel booking. We decided instead
to take our business elsewhere and what a weekend we had.
The Brefni arms Hotel in Arva provided superb accomodation and food,
and catered for all our angling needs. The nearby lakes of hollybank,
Guliadoo, and Glasshouse provided excellent sport, where we caught
and released nearly ninety pike!
I would like to extend our special thanks to the proprietor, Eamonn
Gray and his staff for their kind welcome. The swimming pool, Jacuzzi
and sauna cured many a sore head!
However, it is the business people of the Suck Valley and the other
Shannon areas I commiserate with.
Taking into consideration travel, accommodation, food and entertainment
I conservatively estimate that our trip would have given 5000Euro
to the economy of Roscommon Town. But again, as a direct
result of this permit we took our business elsewhere. I am sure
this type of business, especially in March, just cannot be turned
away and recouped later in the year.
Certainly it won't be recouped from any of our group, because
as long as this permit is in existence none of our group will fish
the Shannon Region. Already plans are taking place to return
to Arva next year, such was our welcome.
I am deeply saddened that we can't fish one of our favorite regions
anymore, i.e the Suck. Nevertheless, I believe we must vote with
our feet and wallets and make a stand and as a group we certainly
intend to.
To the hotel, B&B owners and business people of the region I apologise
for our actions, but I feel it is the only way we can be heard.
Once more, to Mr. Cusack and the S.R.F.B. thank you for pointing
us in the direction of Arva. I am sure such
foresight is much appreciated by the business people in Roscommon
and the Shannon area.
Yours Sincerely,
Sean O' Brien.
***********************************
The following information is factual and states the fundamental
grounds of opposition to gillnets.
GILLNETS
- THE FACTS
What are Gillnets?
"Gillnets are composed of fabric mesh attached to a lead line and
a float line. Gill netting is the capture of fish by entanglement
in a fabric mesh that is not actively moved by man or machine. Although
gill netting requires little skill or special training, it requires
two trips (one to deploy the net and one to collect the fish) and
has the potential for vandalism of the gear. Gill netting also kills
many fish caught in the net or injures fish upon removal. For this
reason, gill netting must not be conducted in areas where endangered,
threatened, or special-concern species may be present."
(The above is an extract from the Website of the "U.S. Geological
Survey")
Gill nets and their use in "Stock Management"
· Gill nets are used each year by three of the Regional Fisheries
Boards to remove Pike and other Coarse fish from a number of large
waters where Wild brown trout and Pike co-exist with the aim of
preserving the trout stock, under the auspices of scientific advice.
· The process of gill netting, contrary to the implementation of
any work plan devised for the safe transfer of any fish captured
therein, is irrefutably responsible for the indiscriminate and unselective
death of, or damage to, most fish caught. · The effect of this is
to destabilise the balance of the remaining stock, which is undeniably
compounded by the removal or uncontrolled eradication of the "larger
pike", the only natural predator of lesser pike.
· Proven scientifically, the removal of these "large pike" leads
to a proliferation of small pike and further compounds the perception
of a pike problem, thereby putting the trout stock under greater
pressure. (According to "Inland Fisheries Trust" data; in 1961 over
5000 gill netted pike weighed 6 tonnes while in 1979, 13000 pike
weighed 6.3 Tonnes. Figures from the "Inland Fisheries Trust" for
the period 1968-1979 also showed a drop in the numbers of trout
caught in the nets from 3035 to 543, therefore gillnetting did not
improve trout numbers, but in fact clearly doubled pike numbers).
Negative impact of gillnets on angling tourism
· The specific use of gillnets by statutory bodies projects an image
from Ireland to International pike anglers that there is no respect
for the pike species.
· Major International pressure to prevent the planned stock management,
by way of gillnetting, proposed under the 1994-1999 Tourism Operational
Programme, almost jeopardised the project, but for an agreement
reached between anglers and the Fisheries Boards. Anglers strongly
believe the full terms of the agreement were not upheld.
· A general decline in quality pike fishing and the destruction
of premium, world famous pike angling that existed on the Wild brown
trout waters has turned British and European anglers to European
"value for money" angling destinations.
· Bord Failte reports show a drop in the number of anglers visiting
Ireland from 170,000 in 1996 to 89,000 in 2000, contrary to an expected
peak at the end of the 1994-1999 TAM project of 240,000 as referenced
to in Dail Eireann on 16th November 1994 by the then Minister for
the Marine Mr. Andrews.
· Gillnetting irrefutably was and still is, partly to blame for
a reduction in visiting pike anglers.
Health and Safety
· Under the 1989 Safety, Health & Welfare at Work Act, employers
have a duty of care towards employee's and the public. The practise
of gillnetting constitutes a workplace by the Fisheries Boards using
them.
· Gillnets, which can stretch for over 400 yards are mostly unsupervised
during the day and left in place overnight, being unmarked except
for a buoy at either end, however the nets become partially submerged
when fish enter, rendering them invisible.
· No accompanying warning signage on bank or water is used and no
precautions to cordon off the area in order to prevent contact by
anglers or other water users are undertaken.
· Anglers are becoming increasingly aware that risks exist, such
as motor entanglement and the subsequent danger in attempting to
become free of the net and also of the hypothetical situation where
an angler or water user could in the event of an emergency, try
to swim ashore unaware of the net's location or indeed presence
and the posed threat to his or her life.
· The issues above are the very least expected in a Health & Safety
plan applied to the use of Gillnets and by virtue of their neglect,
suggest some statutory bodies are exempt from assessing risks concerning
their activities.
This matter will be taken up with the Health & Safety Authority
of Ireland.
Note: Some photographs depicting the reality of Gillnetting
are included for your review. Pike anglers will continue to expose
the truth about gillnets Nationally and Internationally, if necessary,
to ensure a cessation of their use in Irish Fishery Management.
PLEASE END THEIR USE NOW.
Visit
our Website at www.angling-in-ireland.com for further information
************************************
NOTHING
IS SAFE FROM THE GRASP
OF
THESE INDISCRIMINATE
"KILLING
MACHINES"
SWAN
TRAPPED IN GILLNET
DEAD
ROACH
ROTTING
PIKE
DEAD
TENCH AND ROACH
ANOTHER
DEAD PIKE
GANNET
IN GILLNET
GILLNETS
GOTO
OUR WEBSITE www.angling-in-ireland.com
FOR MORE INFORMATION
Return
to Homepage
|